Somehow, by the grace of God, I am still a Catholic, but I don’t know why.
Like many confused Catholics who are praying for the victims of clerical sex abuse, I am also thinking very hard about what it means to be a Catholic now that even the Pope seems to be seriously implicated in this horrendous scandal.
I have no interest in the Vatican’s pathetic attempts to somehow divest Pope Benedict XVI from being personally responsible for his own actions or omissions over many years as he climbed the clerical ladder to the top job in Rome.
That is a cop-out.
Nor am I impressed by those compromised priests like Cardinal Angelo Sodano, who lauded him shamelessly during a solemn Easter Sunday High Mass in Saint Peter’s.
That man was a great defender, like Pope John Paul II, of the notorious Father Marcial Maciel Degolado, founder of the Legion of Christ.
Is it a sin to question the ‘doctrine’ of infallibility?
Is the present Pope a self-loathing homosexual who has sublimated his own predilections?
Was Pope Paul VI also a homosexual, as the tradionalist website Tradition and Action seems to suggest?
How long has this problem of homosexual pederasty and pedophilia invaded the Vatican and spread throughout the whole of the Church of the People of God, if reports of diabolic possession and widespread corruption of the Vatican clergy are to be believed?
I certainly don’t think there is any evidence whatsoever that any Pope is infallible on matters of faith and morals, nor on any matter at all, certainly not this one, nor his predecessor, nor Paul VI, for that matter.
That is an exceptional claim of a hubristic nature, un-Christian in its audacity.
The supposed ‘moral authority’ of all three of them has been seriously compromised by what we now know happened on their watch.
They all failed miserably as Popes to lead the people in truth, and I daresay anyone who continues to defend this shameful record of neglect is compromised, and frankly, defending the institution of the papacy in all its decadence, and not really interested in true justice for the suffering victims of these crimes.
If we need a pope at all, we need one who is humble, quick to admit his human frailty and weakness, and yes, his propensity to sin, like all of us; in other words, we need a Christian confessing Pope, not a ‘Roman’ one in deep denial.
No man or woman on this planet is above reproach, including ‘Papa’ Joseph Ratzinger.
He should therefor offer free access to all secret Vatican clerical sex abuse history files to the Italian police, Interpol, the FBI or whichever police agency is most competent to deal with this global problem of abusing priests and the bishops’ cover-up.
He should similarly order all bishops to open their secret clerical sex abuse history files to local police agencies in every country where the Catholic Church operates, whether that country has a known history of clerical sex abuse or not.
That would and should include the as-yet unreleased secret files of the history of clerical sex abuse in the Diocese of Victoria, where I assume that some problems arose that were swept under the rug, as they apparently were almost everywhere else in the Catholic world.
A proper history of the problem of clerical sex and physical abuse of children, teens and women in the Diocese of Victoria has yet to be written.
There are a couple of reasons why this has not yet happened, and they pertain to the politicization of the Diocese’s official newspaper The Diocesan Messenger, and of its dissident monthly counterpart, The Island Catholic News (ICN).
The former is a poorly designed and editorially timid quarterly steeped in the corporatist clericalism of what can only be called the fascist wing of the Church in Victoria.
The latter is a self-described ‘independent journal of prophetic Catholicism,’ steeped in socialist rhetoric, that regularly runs ads for the local member of Parliament, a pro-abort career politician in the New Democratic Party, Denise Savoie.
ICN is edited by Patrick Jamieson, who published a ‘popular history’ of the Diocese of Victoria in 1997 entitled Victoria Demers to De Roo: 150 years of Catholic History on Vancouver Island, and a hagiography of his favorite Victoria bishop in 2002, entitled In the Avant Garde: The Prophetic Catholicism of Remi De Roo.
Patrick Jamieson is so enamoured of Remi De Roo, who served as Bishop of Victoria for almost 37 years, between 1962 and 1999, he somehow managed to omit any reference in either book to any clerical sex or physical abuse history in the Diocese during that whole period.
That’s quite a dereliction of duty, if I may say so in all charity, even for a supposed ‘popular historian’ who positions himself as some sort of prophet of the left.
There is no mention of the clerical sex abuse issue at all in the Index of either book, something that I find extremely odd, bearing in mind that De Roo was known to be friendly to dissident, defrocked and married priests during that time, and that this period is generally recognized as the most problematic in terms of gross numbers of abusers identified and then transfered to other locales by the ‘cover up bishops.’
Representing the old guard, Monsignor Philip M. Hanley, now apparently demented, had help last year from a committee of loving Catholics who helped him publish his unfinished magnum opus entitled The Early History of the CATHOLIC CHURCH on Vancouver Island, 1843 – 1901.
This book has no Index at all, and I have not yet finished reading it, but the period in question is so distant, that it would be surprising if even veiled references to the problem were to be found in the ancient records, so it is not really relevant here.
It is long past time to write a properly researched and referenced professional history of the problem of the sex and physical abuse of children, teens and women in the Diocese of Victoria, but it should not be written only by the present bishop, but also by both of his living predecessors (bishops Raymond Roussin and Remi De Roo), by the victims, by disinterested lay Catholic canon and civil lawyers, police officers, doctors, therapy councillors and lay historians.
This particular proposed history of the People of God in the Diocese of Victoria, far from being ‘petty gossip,’ as the Pope lamentably suggested such concerns are the other day, would rather help our local Church heal, being part of a type of ‘truth and reconciliation’ process.
Although no statute of limitations should limit this research, practically speaking it should concern itself with the recent period from circa 1950 – 2010.
Prior to writing this post, I checked at the Diocese of Victoria and Saint Andrew’s Cathedral websites, and was shocked and disappointed to find nothing of relevance to these horrific newstories easily found in all the world’s newspapers.
The silence of the present bishop (Richard Gagnon), the Cathedral Rector Father John Laszczyyk, other priests and their bureaucrats at the Diocese and at the Cathedral with respect to this problem is deafening.
It is also time to open the secret sex and sadistic physical abuse history files, allow the victims, priests, or other sane people with any credible allegations or new information about old or ongoing cases of sexual or sadistic physical abuse by priests, brothers or nuns in the Diocese of Victoria to finally come forward in a public forum to set the record straight.
If need be, those victims should press criminal charges, and those guilty priests or other sexual predators should confess and turn themselves in to the secular authorities.
To finally bring justice to the victims, to properly prosecute predators, and to protect innocent priests, brothers and nuns, the best course of action is to allow the presumption of innocence to be maintained in a secular court , until such time as clear culpability is determined.
The Church should be co-operating with all legitimate secular authorities needing legitimate access to legal or other documents, rather than resorting to scapegoating practices of obfuscation, defence or evasion.
So as to protect the laity from having their parish churches sold off to pay out victims, the Diocese should divest the Bishop of Victoria from his legal title to all properties currently ‘owned’ by him (as ‘corporation sole’), and deed them back to the parishes.
Compensation to victims should be paid by the abuser himself.
If that is not possible because of insolvency, parish councils should help the priest or bishop pay the victims with loans taken out on the equity of parish properties.
Under no circumstances should parishioners lose their parish churches because of the criminal sins of their priests or bishops, as this compounds the injustice already done to the victims by further victimizing innocent parishioners.
Once he has ordered these inventories and forums to be done in every Diocese on the planet, the Pope and all Cardinals who elected him should resign.
They should all make themselves available for interrogation by any and all police agencies that might need to talk to them.
Our prayers will be with them, as they would be extended to any miserable Christian sinner who repents, that the grace of God’s infinite mercy might soften their stiff necks, and help them repent of their foolish pride.
Gregory Paul Michael Hartnell, Editor
Easter Week 2010
LA ROSA
