BRIAN BURCHILL ON NEED TO REVEAL 911 TRUTH: ‘Narrative so flawed it raises serious doubts as to legitimacy of supposed war on terror,’ Oak Bay writer’s Sept. 26, 2013 historic letter to Victoria News Editor @ LA ROSA

Published September 28, 2013 by goyodelarosa
Victoria News – Letters to the Editor

9/11 explanation needs to be revisited


By Contributed – Victoria News
Published: September 26, 2013 8:00 PM

The blue-and-orange billboard beside the Pat Bay Highway is part of a world-wide advertising campaign by an association of 2,000 architects and engineers called A&E for 9/11 Truth.

The campaign is endorsed by more than 100 family members of 9/11 victims, who invite us to rethink 9/11 and understand that a third tower, World Trade Centre 7, fell that day in 2001.

The official explanation for its collapse, that it was weakened by falling debris from the Twin Towers and that raging office fires caused its massive steel framework to fail, is contradicted by photo and video evidence.

Tower 7 sustained relatively light damage and its fires never grew hot enough to melt steel. Towers 5 and 6, which also burned, were closer to the Twin Towers and pummelled by falling debris, yet their steel frameworks remained standing.

During Tower 7’s collapse, characteristics of a controlled demolition were plainly evident. The tower fell straight down into its own footprint, at free-fall acceleration, meaning that all its supporting structure was severed almost simultaneously.

In the dust and debris, scientists found residue of the type of explosives and incendiaries used in controlled demolitions because they rapidly melt steel. This explains reports by firemen and first responders that they saw molten metal “flowing like lava.”

Setting up a controlled demolition for such a massive building requires a team of experts with prolonged access.

Given that Tower 7 – which housed the CIA, U.S. Secret Service and the Department of Defence – was one of the most secure buildings in New York City, it is highly unlikely that a team from a foreign country managed to breach its security.

This raises disturbing questions: Who set WTC-7 up for demolition? And why?

Further, it supports the evidence that WTC Towers 1 and 2 were also brought down by controlled demolition.

A new documentary from Massimo Mazzucco called September 11 – The New Pearl Harbour (,  provides new evidence that the official account of 9/11 violates the laws of physics and is therefore impossible.

The official narrative is so flawed it raises serious doubts as to the legitimacy of the supposed war on terror it spawned against Middle East nations, with Syria now threatened to be next.

A valid investigation is still possible and needed to reveal the truth.

Brian Burchill

Oak Bay


Visit | Trouble viewing – View online Rethink911 on Facebook Rethink911 on Twitter logo SEPTEMBER 25, 2013

The Poll Results from Canada Confirm What We Expected:
51% Suspect Controlled Demolition of Building 7 after Seeing Footage
44% Support Investigation, Compared to Just 13% Who Oppose It
54% Believe ReThink911 Ads Are Protected by Free Speech

A new survey by the polling firm YouGov reveals that most Canadians are not opposed to the ads currently appearing in Canadian cities calling for a new investigation into the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7.

Read the full article and download the poll results

We are grateful to all those who donated to make this poll possible. Thanks to you we will continue to have a major impact in Canada!


Support ReThink911 with a donation today Donate

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: